<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 13 Reasons Why Vista Is Crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/2009/07/13-reasons-why-vista-is-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/2009/07/13-reasons-why-vista-is-crap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:05:35 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/2009/07/13-reasons-why-vista-is-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/?p=432#comment-231</guid>
		<description>&quot;11.Folder Type setting constantly needs resetting&quot;

Ain&#039;t that the truth. I work in the film industry, so naturally my folders are full of odd bits of video and audio and Vista ALWAYS decides I want to view crap like some row of little stars (!!!!!).

No. For over twenty years I&#039;ve managed just with the name (including extension), the date and time of creation (very important when I have multiple edits of the same sequence) and the size. But no matter how often I tell Vista just to display file names and their attributes, it keeps reverting to &#039;artist name&#039; and other irrelevances.

And MS have managed to break search. It was going downhill in XP (asking if you wanted to search for &#039;files and folders&#039; or something else - duh, MS, you of all people should know that there are ONLY FILES AND FOLDERS ON A COMPUTER!!!!!), but in Vista it&#039;s completely broken, luckily I found &#039;Agent Rucksack&#039; which is not only much faster, it also allows for multiple filters.

In my humble opinion, Windows reached its heights with Win 2000 and they haven&#039;t really introduced anything important since. With Vista there are often times that I just drop back to the C:&gt; prompt, it&#039;s quicker and MUCH	simpler than f**king around with all MS&#039;s silly pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;11.Folder Type setting constantly needs resetting&#8221;</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t that the truth. I work in the film industry, so naturally my folders are full of odd bits of video and audio and Vista ALWAYS decides I want to view crap like some row of little stars (!!!!!).</p>
<p>No. For over twenty years I&#8217;ve managed just with the name (including extension), the date and time of creation (very important when I have multiple edits of the same sequence) and the size. But no matter how often I tell Vista just to display file names and their attributes, it keeps reverting to &#8216;artist name&#8217; and other irrelevances.</p>
<p>And MS have managed to break search. It was going downhill in XP (asking if you wanted to search for &#8216;files and folders&#8217; or something else &#8211; duh, MS, you of all people should know that there are ONLY FILES AND FOLDERS ON A COMPUTER!!!!!), but in Vista it&#8217;s completely broken, luckily I found &#8216;Agent Rucksack&#8217; which is not only much faster, it also allows for multiple filters.</p>
<p>In my humble opinion, Windows reached its heights with Win 2000 and they haven&#8217;t really introduced anything important since. With Vista there are often times that I just drop back to the C:&gt; prompt, it&#8217;s quicker and MUCH	simpler than f**king around with all MS&#8217;s silly pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on User Testing - Synaptic Mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/2009/07/13-reasons-why-vista-is-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on User Testing - Synaptic Mishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/?p=432#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m now left with this uncomfortable feeling of having all my interface foundations taken away and going back to the drawing board. It&#8217;s put me significantly behind time. And it&#8217;s hard to accept that I&#8217;m as capable as Microsoft of making a usability nightmare. Hmmm. Maybe not quite that capable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m now left with this uncomfortable feeling of having all my interface foundations taken away and going back to the drawing board. It&#8217;s put me significantly behind time. And it&#8217;s hard to accept that I&#8217;m as capable as Microsoft of making a usability nightmare. Hmmm. Maybe not quite that capable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Hortin</title>
		<link>http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/2009/07/13-reasons-why-vista-is-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Hortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maddisondesigns.com/blog/?p=432#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Good choice removing Vista Rich! This OS caused no end of problems for me. The only reason I stuck with it rather than going back to XP was that I knew Windows 7 was coming along soon. It was 64bit whereas my XP was only 32bit. Since I had over 4GB&#039;s of memory I didn&#039;t wan&#039;t to waste over 2GB&#039;s of it by going back to a 32bit OS. Also, even if I&#039;d managed to get my hands on a copy of XP 64bit, unfortunately there&#039;s very limited drivers available for that OS.

Thankfully now I&#039;m Vista free, with all my machines are running Win7. Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice removing Vista Rich! This OS caused no end of problems for me. The only reason I stuck with it rather than going back to XP was that I knew Windows 7 was coming along soon. It was 64bit whereas my XP was only 32bit. Since I had over 4GB&#8217;s of memory I didn&#8217;t wan&#8217;t to waste over 2GB&#8217;s of it by going back to a 32bit OS. Also, even if I&#8217;d managed to get my hands on a copy of XP 64bit, unfortunately there&#8217;s very limited drivers available for that OS.</p>
<p>Thankfully now I&#8217;m Vista free, with all my machines are running Win7. Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
